Leaders in
Hand Protection
and PPE

EN 388 is a European Standard. Cut Level is determined by the number of cycles it takes a spinning circular blade, that is pulled across the material under a constant weight of 500 grams, to cut the fabric. As the number of cycles increase, so does the glove's ratings. Click here for more information about the EN 388 2016 standard.

To attain the EN 374 pictogram shield gloves must pass at least a Level 2 in three chemicals. The chemicals listed above are the chemicals that passed for this glove.

To see what chemicals included in the manufacturing of this product triggered the Prop 65 Warning please go to the Prop 65 Portal.

To see what chemicals included in the manufacturing of this product triggered the Prop 65 Warning please go to the Prop 65 Portal.

To see what chemicals included in the manufacturing of this product triggered the Prop 65 Warning please go to the Prop 65 Portal.

This test method assesses the cut resistance of a material when exposed to a cutting edge under specified loads. Data obtained from this test method can be used to compare the cut resistance of different materials with scores ranging from A1-A9. Click here to learn more.

This item offers cut protection in the following locations:

Abdomen: A8
Back: A8
Belly Patch: A9
Bicep: A8
Chest: A8
Forearm: A7
Neck/Collar: A9

This test method assesses the cut resistance of a material when exposed to a cutting edge under specified loads. Data obtained from this test method can be used to compare the cut resistance of different materials with scores ranging from A1-A9. Click here to learn more.

This item offers cut protection in the following locations:

Abdomen: A5
Bicep: A8
Chest: A5
Forearm: A5
Neck/Collar: A7
Upper Back: A5

Applies to retro-reflective equipped pants or shorts, designed to be worn in combination with either Class 2 or Class 3 tops. When worn in this manner, the ensemble is rated as Performance Class 3.

To see what chemicals included in the manufacturing of this product triggered the Prop 65 Warning please go to the Prop 65 Portal.

The NFPA has identified the various FR hazardous risk category levels, which range from PPE 1 (which is low risk and requires AR clothing with a minimum arc rating of 4), up to PPE 4 (which is high risk and requires AR clothing with a minimum arc rating of 40). Each level, 1-4, is rated at a certain amount of flame resistance measured in cal/cm2.

To see what chemicals included in the manufacturing of this product triggered the Prop 65 Warning please go to the Prop 65 Portal.

New edition ANSI/ISEA 105-2024 outlines a new test method for determining cut scores and a revised scale from A1-A9. Click here for more information about the new testing standard.

The ANSI/ISEA 105-2024 standard outlines test methods for abrasion and is scored from 0-6. The ASTM D3884-09 is used for uncoated gloves and the end point (failure) is the number of abrasion cycles when the first thread or yarn is broken. The larger numbers of cycles indicates greater abrasion resistance of the product and a higher Abrasion Level.

The ANSI/ISEA 105-2016 standard outlines test methods for contact heat and scored from 0-5. The ASTM F1060-18 test is used to test conductive heat resistance against gloves and PPE. Measuring the highest contact temperature for which the time to second-degree burn is at least 15 seconds and the alarm time is at least four seconds. Learn More

The NFPA has identified the various FR hazardous risk category levels, which range from PPE 1 (which is low risk and requires AR clothing with a minimum arc rating of 4), up to PPE 4 (which is high risk and requires AR clothing with a minimum arc rating of 40). Each level, 1-4, is rated at a certain amount of flame resistance measured in cal/cm2.

To see what chemicals included in the manufacturing of this product triggered the Prop 65 Warning please go to the Prop 65 Portal.

To see what chemicals included in the manufacturing of this product triggered the Prop 65 Warning please go to the Prop 65 Portal.

New edition ANSI/ISEA 105-2024 outlines a new test method for determining cut scores and a revised scale from A1-A9. Click here for more information about the new testing standard.

To see what chemicals included in the manufacturing of this product triggered the Prop 65 Warning please go to the Prop 65 Portal.

The ANSI/ISEA 105-2016 standard outlines test methods for contact heat and scored from 0-5. The ASTM F1060-18 test is used to test conductive heat resistance against gloves and PPE. Measuring the highest contact temperature for which the time to second-degree burn is at least 15 seconds and the alarm time is at least four seconds. Learn More

We have a dedicated team that manages all of your logo requests and will help ensure the process runs smoothly from start to finish. If you have any questions along the way, they will be more than happy to assist you.

Experience the Difference

Type/Class R2 apparel is necessary for workers exposed to traffic traveling over 25 mph and who work against complex backgrounds.

We have a dedicated team that manages all of your logo requests and will help ensure the process runs smoothly from start to finish. If you have any questions along the way, they will be more than happy to assist you.

Experience the Difference

New edition ANSI/ISEA 105-2024 outlines a new test method for determining cut scores and a revised scale from A1-A9. Click here for more information about the new testing standard.

The ANSI/ISEA 105-2024 standard outlines test methods for abrasion and is scored from 0-6. The ASTM D3884-09 is used for uncoated gloves and the end point (failure) is the number of abrasion cycles when the first thread or yarn is broken. The larger numbers of cycles indicates greater abrasion resistance of the product and a higher Abrasion Level.

PIP® has collaborated with global partners like Dyneema® to develop bio-based ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fiber delivers the same performance as conventional HPPE fibers, but with a lower carbon footprint. This innovative technique utilizes the mass balance approach and further reduces our reliance on fossil fuel-based resources.

We have a dedicated team that manages all of your logo requests and will help ensure the process runs smoothly from start to finish. If you have any questions along the way, they will be more than happy to assist you.

Experience the Difference

PIP® has taken our innovative platform to the next level, we use recycled P.E.T. water bottles – shredded and extruded as a fiber creating a comfortable and cool material as well as recycled polyester yarns used to create yarns for gloves and apparel.

PIP® has collaborated with global partners like Dyneema® to develop bio-based ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fiber delivers the same performance as conventional HPPE fibers, but with a lower carbon footprint. This innovative technique utilizes the mass balance approach and further reduces our reliance on fossil fuel-based resources.

This test method assesses the cut resistance of a material when exposed to a cutting edge under specified loads. Data obtained from this test method can be used to compare the cut resistance of different materials with scores ranging from A1-A9. Click here to learn more.

This item offers cut protection in the following locations:

Abdomen: A6
Bicep: A4
Chest: A4
Forearm: A5
Neck/Collar: A7
Torso: A6
Upper Back: A4

We have a dedicated team that manages all of your logo requests and will help ensure the process runs smoothly from start to finish. If you have any questions along the way, they will be more than happy to assist you.

Experience the Difference

To see what chemicals included in the manufacturing of this product triggered the Prop 65 Warning please go to the Prop 65 Portal.

Non-ANSI garments are color enhanced and offer an additional level of safety for low risk activities, but do not meet ANSI standards.

We have a dedicated team that manages all of your logo requests and will help ensure the process runs smoothly from start to finish. If you have any questions along the way, they will be more than happy to assist you.

Experience the Difference

New edition ANSI/ISEA 105-2024 outlines a new test method for determining cut scores and a revised scale from A1-A9. Click here for more information about the new testing standard.

The ANSI/ISEA 105-2024 standard outlines test methods for abrasion and is scored from 0-6. The ASTM D3884-09 is used for uncoated gloves and the end point (failure) is the number of abrasion cycles when the first thread or yarn is broken. The larger numbers of cycles indicates greater abrasion resistance of the product and a higher Abrasion Level.

To see what chemicals included in the manufacturing of this product triggered the Prop 65 Warning please go to the Prop 65 Portal.